Read here, here, here, here, and here. For past Congressional testimony on this subject, download here and here. The
"science" of global warming claims by the IPCC is being carefully
scrutinized by a band of independent, objective analysts. The
result of this relentless scientific scrutiny continue to be shocking revelations of incredibly bad science
that the IPCC published, and in recent days the revelations have been
eye-popping. What's the importance of this?
In a nutshell, the IPCC
appears to have utilized a group of scientists whose sole purpose was
to fabricate global temperature histories in order to make our current global
temperatures look high. Unfortunately for the IPCC, these fabricated,
reconstructed temperatures can't stand up to close scientific and
statistical analysis; and, it has now been confirmed by this persistent
effort that past temperatures were indeed higher than present ones.
Read these recent analysis summaries and decide on your own: is it gross scientific
incompetence or fabricated evidence fraud or something else entirely?
