Read here. The IPCC climate scientists involved with the global warming fraud originating out of the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) now report that the critical raw temperature data have been purposefully deleted, which means it may never be recovered. The only reason to delete the original,....
raw data is to effectively "coverup" the data fraud that has been practiced by these IPCC "professionals."
Every single scientist who may have had even potentially, the slightest involvement in the IPCC fraud effort should be suspended from their duties/responsibilities temporarily until all data, programs, and files can be professionally secured from future destruction prior to any investigations and/or tribunals. The names of potential candidates (scientists and bureaucrats) for secure lock down of all their files and emails are listed below, and come come from these two sources; any form of data and information held by these individuals needs to be securely locked down, ASAP. (The same data lock down to prevent further destruction of information should be expanded to all their assistants/subordinates.)Ammann, Caspar; Bader, David; Bamzai, Anjuli; Berge, Pat; Bradley, Raymond; Briffa, Keith; Cook, Ed; Free, Melissa; Gleckler, Peter; Goldstein, Bill; Haimberger, Leopold; Holland, David; Hughes, Malcolm; Inglis, Kitty; Jansen, Eyestein; Jones, Philip; Joos, Fortunat; Karl, Thomas; Keenan, Tom; Klein, Steve; Lanzante, John; Leduc, Sharon; Mann, Michael; Masson, Valerie; McGregor, Glenn; Mears, Carl; Miller, George; Murray, Cherry; Nychka, Doug; Oppenheimer, Michael; Osborn, Tim; Otto-bleisner, Bette; Overpeck, John; Owen, Karen; Palmer, Dave; Peterson, Thomas; Pierrehumbert, Raymond; Rahmstorf, Stefan; Rotman, Doug; Rubia, Tomas Diaz De La; Rutherford, Scott; Santer, Ben; Schmidt, Gavin; Schneider, Steven; Seidel, Dian; Sherwood, Steven; Solomon, Susan; Taylor, Karl; Thorne, Peter; Trenberth, Kevin; Villalba, Ricardo; Wahl, Eugene; Wang, Wei-Chyung; Wentz, Frank; Wigley, Tom
In the meantime, any past studies associated with these individuals should be assumed to be tainted by the Climategate fraud and not relevant to any policy decisions. Certainly, no Copenhagen agreement/accord should be based on any science published by the above.
And finally, the "ends justify the means" mentality of the liberal-leftist scientists and bureaucrats associated with Climategate conspiracy provides ample evidence of a concerted attempt to undermine an objective scientific process and methodologies. For that reason alone, these people should permanently be barred from any government funded research and any scientific literature peer-review process. Time to clean house and de-politicize climate science.
