The Global Warming Debate Is Over: 'New Scientist' Magazine Admits Modern Temperatures Are Not Unprecedented
Global Warming (AGW) proponents finally admit defeat? They now say modern warming is just a fraction of past natural warming
Read here. The publication New Scientist has been at the forefront of global warming and climate change hysteria. After years of promoting climate model quackery and publicizing the ludicrous scare predictions from models, the editors must have mainlined truth serum as they publish actual empirical evidence. Or, maybe they're getting tired of pushing fabricated alarmist B.S., eh?
As proof, this adjacent chart was published by the New Scientist and it clearly shows that modern "unprecedented" global warming is no such thing.
If the New Scientist is now in the business of promoting truth and needs a source of additional empirical evidence charts, they certainly can use the many charts found here and here.
You say, "what the heck is going on here?" Well...after the miserable defeats at Durban, Cancun and Copenhagen, and in combination with the continuing Climategate2.0 exposure of the IPCC's fraudulent science, the global warming debate may be coming to an end, fitfully.
Maybe a clear sign of AGW proponents begging for mercy is their new embracement of actual empirical evidence regarding the climate. Enjoy while it lasts.