Government bureaucrat-scientists and their expert "global warming" climate models, based on levels of atmospheric CO2, continue to prove an astounding incompetence - billions of taxpayer monies wasted on failed computer simulations that can't predict global temperatures
(click on images to enlarge)
The skill of government funded climate models to accurately predict global temperatures has proven to be non-existent (through September 30, 2012). The left and middle charts represent the bureaucrats' NASA/GISS and IPCC climate model failures, respectively.
Why do they fail so spectacularly? Primarily, they are based on the rather flimsy, highly speculative CO2-centric AGW hypothesis. Because of this "consensus" favored AGW hypothesis, these computer simulations literally can't predict squat.
The third chart (rightmost) represents a climate model that has performed significantly better at predicting global temperatures. This computer simulation essentially ignores the consensus-phobia regarding atmospheric CO2 levels.
Of course, despite the massive failure of the bureaucrat climate models, and the corresponding success of alternative, non-consensus models, we can all predict with great accuracy the 'climate models' that the politicians will waste future taxpayer funds on, no?