« Those Stubborn Facts: NOAA Confirms U.S. Drought Conditions Lessen, Opposite Of Expert Predictions | Main | 25 Years of Cooling: Climate Science Evidence That "Experts" Would Prefer Not Be Discussed »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a010536b58035970c01a3fc8caff9970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NASA's 'Climate-Porn' Ruined By Empirical Evidence: Accelerated Warming of Global Oceans Does Not Exist:

Comments

C3 Editor

Frederick: Bob Tisdale (www.bobtisdale.wordpress.com) produces long-term ocean charts back to inception every single month. Go look and bookmark his site. To keep abreast of ocean temperatures, his site is a must read.

Not to repeat what Bob does every single month, I present datasets using charts with different parameters and timescales. My blog, my interests and my rules - capiche?

Seriously? Making a prediction 25 years ago that is invalidated by empirical evidence is not relevant? (Warning: I usually delete the really stupid comments of readers. Careful, Frederick.)

'C3'

Frederick Colbourne

How about a chart with a longer timescale. Why would the date of NASA's announcement be relevant to the scientific question, have SSTs accelerated in the last years, or from whatever date there is reliable and consistent data.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Categories