Read here. My own opinion is that the guy has some form of mental disorder, which might(?) make him unfit for scholarship or teaching duties. In his best interests, he should not grant any further interviews unless his intent is to actually ruin the credibility of all leftist/liberal scientists in the climate science field.
"This guy is a stunning mixture of a complete lack of integrity and a complete lack of sanity."
Or, this:
"Reading the e-mails, it quickly becomes clear that leading alarmist scientists, like Michael Mann at Penn State and Phil Jones at the CRU, seemed positively obsessed – almost to the point of appearing deranged at times..."