Is IPCC lying an addiction? A psychological disorder? Pathological contagion living within the climate alarmist science community? Over the past seven months, one is left simply jaw-gaping from the the uncovered falsehoods that the IPCC "science" effort generated in its 2007 report. Even with all the outrage the untruths have provoked, the lies just keep coming. The latest?
At his Amsterdam presentation, Pachauri claims that all the 18,000 plus publications used in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report are peer-reviewed. Here is his PowerPoint slide with the obvious lie.
It is now well known by most that the 2007 report is rife with non peer-reviewed publications. In fact, a recent audit was conducted on the AR4 and it was found that some 5,587 (out of 18,000) references were not peer-reviewed publications. Despite the well known, actual facts, the IPCC just can't seem to help themselves by simply not repeating known lies.
Really, would it be possible for the United Nation's IPCC to just stop the lying? Nahhhh. It's time to kill the IPCC since it has already murdered its credibility.