Read here. More and more people are thankfully coming to the realization that the IPCC is nothing more than a political hack group, pushing the green's highly desired global governance policies - using human CO2 as the proverbial UN nose under the sovereign nation tent flap. One means that the IPCC aggressively uses to promote their non-scientific agenda is the reliance on activists from prominent green organizations.
One of the primary green groups that uses its position to corrupt IPCC "climate science" is the World Wildlife Federation (WWF). Nothing wrong with the WWF pushing for what policies they think are right, but no one considers the WWF idea of "science" as impartial or objective. If the UN truly wants the next IPCC report to be believed outside the halls of its own bureaucracy, then no way should any WWF employee be directly involved in any of the IPCC science/economic impact deliberations for the future report.
"How can Moss – who has cashed paycheques from a charity dedicated to advancing the UN’s agenda and from an activist group whose fundraising prospects are connected to the public’s sense of alarm – be regarded as a dispassionate and neutral scientist?.....I find Moss’ testimony to a US Senate committee in November 2007 troubling. It suggests that senior scientists see their government positions, their academic positions, IPCC activities, employment with the United Nations, and employment with activist groups as being all interconnected and pretty much equivalent. To me, this suggests that activist scientists are far from rare. It appears that activism has become the new normal."
As always, it never hurts to remind oneself what the UN, the IPCC and its power brokers are really after - their own words best explain what's at stake.