The myths and urban legends of disastrous, catastrophic global warming that IPCC "scientists" perpetuate have become less believable as global warming has literally disappeared - unfortunately, most of these green, CO2-jihadist climate scientists still pursue empirical malfeasance by purposefully misleading policymakers and the public with even more temperature fabrications
(click on image to enlarge, image source)
A very interesting article over at WUWT regarding the new "restatement" of temperature empirical evidence by the folks in charge of publishing the HadCRUT4 global temperature dataset.
The HC4 dataset is brand new, first being published in 2012 to replace the IPCC's gold-standard, the HadCRUT3 dataset. And now it's announced that the scientists did such a bang-up job in 2012 that they had to completely revise the HC4...less than 12 months later.
As the adjacent chart makes perfectly clear, this new revised HC4 "global warming trend" (green trend line) is significantly higher than the non-warming HC3 trend exhibited since 1997 (see red trend line).
As is well known, there exists much evidence of a continuous, disturbing pattern of temperature dataset fabrication/manipulation that consists of changing the historical empirical evidence to better portray the alarmist agenda of dangerous global warming. To accomplish such fabrication, IPCC-favored "scientists" will utilize extreme methods to generate faux warming. The result being outcomes that are outside the realm of normal reality, such as:
"Werner Brozek says:
May 13, 2013 at 3:56 pm
From 1997 to 2012 is 16 years. Here are the changes in thousandths of a degree with the new version of Hadcrut4 being higher than the old version in all cases. So starting with 1997, the numbers are 2, 8, 3, 3, 4, 7, 7, 7, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 7, 8, and 15. The 0.015 was for 2012. What are the chances that the average anomaly goes up for 16 straight years by pure chance alone if a number of new sites are discovered? Assuming a 50% chance that the anomaly could go either way, the chances of 16 straight years of rises is 1 in 2^16 or 1 in 65,536. Of course this does not prove fraud, but considering that “HadCRUT4 was introduced in March 2012”, it just begs the question why it needed a major overhaul only a year later...I believe people should not wonder why suspicions are aroused as to whether or not everything is kosher."
So, in essence, the likelihood of these latest HC4 temperature "global warming" adjustments being truthful is about as probable as one flipping a coin 16 times and getting a 'heads' all 16 times -robustly not likely.
Conclusion: The IPCC's and other climate research agencies bogus/ludicrous "climate science" is never-ending, and that is a 100% certainty.